A reflection and response on end-of-life choices


27 November 2024 – 26 Heshvan 5785

Liberal Judaism and Reform Judaism logos

By Rabbi Josh Levy and Rabbi Charley Baginsky

The question of whether to change the law on end-of-life choices is among the most challenging ethical and theological issues of our time. It is a subject that stirs deep emotions, profound moral reflection, and intense debate across society.

As Co-Leads of Progressive Judaism in the UK, we try to offer a perspective that reflects the diversity of thought within our movement while affirming our shared commitment to compassion and care for our congregants.

Our clergy represent a breadth of opinion on this complex issue.

Within our movement, some rabbis emphasise the Jewish teaching that life is a gift from God, sacred and inviolable, and that any deliberate ending of life risks transgressing this divine trust.

Others draw on equally compelling Jewish values, such as compassion for those who are suffering and the primacy of human dignity.

There are also those who do not oppose assisted dying in principle, but have specific concerns about its implementation, or whether this can be introduced at a time of crisis in our public services, including in social and palliative care.

In all these perspectives, these are the “words of a living God.” Jewish tradition does not demand uniformity of belief. It celebrates the tension between differing truths, seeing it as a hallmark of an ongoing, dynamic covenant with the Divine. The Talmud teaches us that “these and these are the words of the living God” (Eilu v’eilu divrei Elohim chayim, Eruvin 13b), reminding us that our sacred texts – and the interpretations that flow from them – often hold multiple, sometimes contradictory truths.

This diversity of opinion is why we, as Co-Leads of Progressive Judaism, have chosen not to sign the open letter released by other faith leaders opposing changes to end-of-life laws. We have also chosen not to sign letters, when asked, in favour of a change.

While we respect the conviction of those who sign, and campaign, on both sides of this debate – we believe it is essential to acknowledge the nuance and complexity.

Any attempt to present a singular religious perspective risks misrepresenting the diversity of thought within Judaism and silencing important voices.

Our movement is built on the strength of our congregations, which span the country. We encourage every community to explore this topic thoughtfully, ensuring that the wide variety of Jewish views is made known and heard

Whether a congregation emphasises the sanctity of life, the importance of alleviating suffering, or seeks a balance between the two, these discussions enrich the Jewish response to this critical issue and reflect the complexity of our tradition.

Ultimately, our shared commitment is to our congregants. Regardless of the legal framework that emerges, all our clergy are united in their dedication to supporting individuals and families navigating the profound challenges of end-of-life decisions.

Whether providing pastoral care, offering guidance rooted in Jewish wisdom, or simply being present in moments of need, we see our role as facilitators of compassion and understanding, not arbiters of judgment.

As a movement, we encourage open, honest, and respectful dialogue. These conversations are never easy, but they are vital. They remind us of our collective responsibility to wrestle with ethical dilemmas in a way that honours the sanctity of life while holding space for human suffering and dignity.

Progressive Judaism has always embraced complexity. Our tradition challenges us to live with uncertainty, to ask difficult questions, and to find holiness not in uniformity, but in the diversity of our responses. In this spirit, we approach the issue of end-of-life choices with humility, empathy, and unwavering support for those we serve.

Whether one sees this debate through the lens of compassion, autonomy, or sacred duty, we are all bound by a common commitment: to honour life in all its complexity and to stand with our congregants, whatever their choices may be.

Share this Post